As such, there is notable variability in scale-specific findings as well as in the type of behaviors that are predicted on the MMPI-2-RF. Moreover, studies have frequently focused on outcomes using clients who have already initiated treatment across different settings, while only one has examined the capacity of the MMPI-2-RF scales to predict treatment initiation (Arbisi et al., 2013). For instance, externalizing scales frequently emerge as indicators of treatment dropout (Anestis et al., 2015 Mattson et al., 2012 Tylicki et al., 2019) however, is not always true (Arbisi et al., 2013 Tarescavage et al., 2015). Literature surrounding the MMPI-2-RF has started to demonstrate convergence about which scales best predict treatment engagement and outcomes however, it is also limited in several ways. This was presented at the 2020 MMPI symposium and the PowerPoint may be FOUND HERE Nicole recently presented research summarizing a paper we have out for review examining the utility of the MMPI-2-RF and MMPI-3 to predict treatment use and treatment-related attitudes in a short-term longitudinal sample of individuals with moderate to severe depressive symptoms.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |